vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ATRenew Inc. (RERE) and SMITH MIDLAND CORP (SMID). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ATRenew Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.2M vs $23.1M, roughly 1.9× SMITH MIDLAND CORP). ATRenew Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs 9.2%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
ATRenew Inc.REREEarnings & Financial Report
ATRenew Inc. operates a leading pre-owned consumer electronics transaction and servicing ecosystem primarily in China. Its core services include end-to-end device recycling, professional quality inspection, certified refurbishment, and resale of smartphones, laptops, tablets and other digital products, serving both individual consumers and enterprise clients across domestic and select Southeast Asian markets.
Smith Midland Corp is a specialized manufacturer of precast concrete products for infrastructure, commercial, residential and industrial construction uses. Its key product lines include highway safety barriers, acoustic sound walls, architectural precast panels, and stormwater management systems, serving primarily the North American market with durable, sustainable construction solutions.
RERE vs SMID — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2023 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.2M | $23.1M |
| Net Profit | $7.3M | $2.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 37.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.9% | 9.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 24.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 52.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $557.1M | $54.3M |
| Total Assets | $722.9M | $87.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $87.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $66.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $64.9M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RERE
Segment breakdown not available.
SMID
| Product Sales | $13.8M | 60% |
| Service Revenue | $9.3M | 40% |
