vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Regions Financial Corporation (RF) and Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Regions Financial Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.0× Zoom Communications, Inc.). Zoom Communications, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 49.8% vs 41.7%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zoom Communications, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Regions Financial Corporation's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs 3.6%).

Regions Financial Corporation is an American bank holding company headquartered in the Regions Center in Birmingham, Alabama. The company provides retail and commercial banking, trust, stock brokerage, and mortgage services. Its banking subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates about 2,000 automated teller machines and 1,300 branches in 15 states in the Southern and Midwestern United States.

Zoom Communications, Inc. is an American communications technology company headquartered in San Jose, California, United States. It is primarily known for the videoconferencing application Zoom.

RF vs ZM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RF
RF
1.0× larger
RF
$1.3B
$1.2B
ZM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ZM
ZM
+0.3% gap
ZM
4.4%
4.1%
RF
Higher net margin
ZM
ZM
8.1% more per $
ZM
49.8%
41.7%
RF
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RF
RF
Annualised
RF
4.0%
3.6%
ZM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Revenue
$1.3B
$1.2B
Net Profit
$534.0M
$612.9M
Gross Margin
77.9%
Operating Margin
55.3%
25.2%
Net Margin
41.7%
49.8%
Revenue YoY
4.1%
4.4%
Net Profit YoY
0.0%
196.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.59
$2.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$1.1B
Net Profit
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$534.0M
$612.9M
Q3 25
$569.0M
$358.6M
Q2 25
$563.0M
$254.6M
Q1 25
$490.0M
$367.9M
Q4 24
$534.0M
$207.1M
Q3 24
$490.0M
$219.0M
Q2 24
$501.0M
$216.3M
Q1 24
$368.0M
$298.8M
Gross Margin
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
77.9%
Q3 25
77.6%
Q2 25
76.3%
Q1 25
75.7%
Q4 24
75.9%
Q3 24
75.5%
Q2 24
76.1%
Q1 24
75.9%
Operating Margin
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
55.3%
25.2%
Q3 25
56.3%
26.4%
Q2 25
56.1%
20.6%
Q1 25
52.0%
19.0%
Q4 24
53.4%
15.5%
Q3 24
49.9%
17.4%
Q2 24
52.7%
17.8%
Q1 24
39.2%
14.7%
Net Margin
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
41.7%
49.8%
Q3 25
45.3%
29.5%
Q2 25
44.7%
21.7%
Q1 25
41.0%
31.1%
Q4 24
43.4%
17.6%
Q3 24
40.2%
18.8%
Q2 24
42.2%
19.0%
Q1 24
31.1%
26.1%
EPS (diluted)
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$0.59
$2.01
Q3 25
$0.61
$1.16
Q2 25
$0.59
$0.81
Q1 25
$0.51
$1.16
Q4 24
$0.55
$0.66
Q3 24
$0.49
$0.70
Q2 24
$0.52
$0.69
Q1 24
$0.37
$0.98

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.2B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$19.0B
$9.3B
Total Assets
$158.8B
$11.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.22×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.9B
Q1 24
$1.6B
Total Debt
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$4.1B
Q3 25
$4.8B
Q2 25
$5.3B
Q1 25
$6.0B
Q4 24
$6.0B
Q3 24
$6.0B
Q2 24
$5.1B
Q1 24
$3.3B
Stockholders' Equity
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$19.0B
$9.3B
Q3 25
$19.0B
$9.0B
Q2 25
$18.7B
$8.9B
Q1 25
$18.5B
$8.9B
Q4 24
$17.9B
$8.7B
Q3 24
$18.7B
$8.5B
Q2 24
$17.2B
$8.3B
Q1 24
$17.0B
$8.0B
Total Assets
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$158.8B
$11.4B
Q3 25
$159.9B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$159.2B
$11.0B
Q1 25
$159.8B
$11.0B
Q4 24
$157.3B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$157.4B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$154.1B
$10.3B
Q1 24
$154.9B
$9.9B
Debt / Equity
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
0.22×
Q3 25
0.25×
Q2 25
0.28×
Q1 25
0.32×
Q4 24
0.34×
Q3 24
0.32×
Q2 24
0.30×
Q1 24
0.20×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-319.0M
$629.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$614.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
50.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.60×
1.03×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$-319.0M
$629.3M
Q3 25
$861.0M
$515.9M
Q2 25
$573.0M
$489.3M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$424.6M
Q4 24
$-220.0M
$483.2M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$449.3M
Q2 24
$161.0M
$588.2M
Q1 24
$396.0M
$351.2M
Free Cash Flow
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
$614.3M
Q3 25
$508.0M
Q2 25
$463.4M
Q1 25
$416.2M
Q4 24
$457.7M
Q3 24
$365.1M
Q2 24
$569.7M
Q1 24
$332.7M
FCF Margin
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
50.0%
Q3 25
41.7%
Q2 25
39.4%
Q1 25
35.2%
Q4 24
38.9%
Q3 24
31.4%
Q2 24
49.9%
Q1 24
29.0%
Capex Intensity
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
0.7%
Q2 25
2.2%
Q1 25
0.7%
Q4 24
2.2%
Q3 24
7.2%
Q2 24
1.6%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
RF
RF
ZM
ZM
Q4 25
-0.60×
1.03×
Q3 25
1.51×
1.44×
Q2 25
1.02×
1.92×
Q1 25
2.18×
1.15×
Q4 24
-0.41×
2.33×
Q3 24
2.57×
2.05×
Q2 24
0.32×
2.72×
Q1 24
1.08×
1.18×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

RF
RF

Consumer Bank$747.0M58%
Corporate Bank$487.0M38%
Wealth Management$47.0M4%

ZM
ZM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons