vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of R F INDUSTRIES LTD (RFIL) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
R F INDUSTRIES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.7M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.6× Venus Concept Inc.). R F INDUSTRIES LTD runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -163.8%, a 164.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, R F INDUSTRIES LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.9% vs -8.2%). R F INDUSTRIES LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0M vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, R F INDUSTRIES LTD's revenue compounded faster (29.8% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
RFIL vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.7M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $173.0K | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.9% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 172.7% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $173.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.0K | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.0K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-245.0K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-238.0K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-705.0K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.8% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.3% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.5% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.5% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.6% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.5% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.7% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.1% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.41 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.13 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.2M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $73.0M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $839.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.7M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $73.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.2M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.7M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.4M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.9M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.1M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.1M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.0% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.3M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-311.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $601.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-244.0K | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $840.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-419.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $574.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-418.0K | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $697.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 12.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RFIL
| US | $20.9M | 92% |
| Non Us | $1.8M | 8% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
