vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sezzle Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($135.5M vs $117.7M, roughly 1.2× RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.9% vs -10.8%, a 48.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs -19.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (111.9% CAGR vs -11.8%).
RGP, formerly known as Resources Global Professionals, is the operating arm of Resources Connection, Inc.. The company provides consulting services in the areas of finance & accounting, information management, governance, risk & compliance (GRC), human capital, legal & regulatory, corporate advisory & restructuring, strategic communications, and supply chain management. As of fiscal year ending May 28, 2016, the company employed 3,283 professionals in 68 offices in 20 countries around the wor...
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
RGP vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $117.7M | $135.5M |
| Net Profit | $-12.7M | $51.3M |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.2% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 81.6% | 41.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.7M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.2M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.3M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.4M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.6M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.9M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.2M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.3M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.1M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-68.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.3% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -47.0% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -38.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.7% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.5% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -52.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.0% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.2% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.21 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.34 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.08 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $194.6M | $196.7M |
| Total Assets | $289.3M | $454.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $89.8M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.5M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.6M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $108.9M | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $194.6M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.4M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.1M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.8M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.7M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.8M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.3M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $287.2M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.7M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.6M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.9M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $512.9M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $510.9M | $212.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $24.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.9M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.8M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0K | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-309.0K | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $238.0K | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.0K | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-575.0K | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $22.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.6% | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 73.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.30× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RGP
| US | $93.7M | 80% |
| Non Us | $24.0M | 20% |
SEZL
Segment breakdown not available.
