vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RH (RH) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $883.8M, roughly 1.4× RH). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 4.1%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RH posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $83.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RH's revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs 2.0%).
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
RH vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $883.8M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $36.3M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.3% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.83 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $883.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $899.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $814.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $811.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $829.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $727.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $738.3M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $36.3M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.2M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.83 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.62 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.40 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.66 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.45 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.91 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $43.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-40.9M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-110.8M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-163.6M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-183.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-234.7M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-289.9M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-297.4M | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $131.9M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.4% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.64× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $128.1M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $131.9M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.6M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.4M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.1M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-114.0M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $83.0M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.7M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.1M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.7M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-37.9M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.1M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-251.5M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -34.1% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.64× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.66× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.78× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.35× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.95× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.01× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
