vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($664.6M vs $435.8M, roughly 1.5× SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP). Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 10.1%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.1% CAGR vs 3.9%).
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
RHP vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $664.6M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $69.4M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.1% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.03 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $664.6M | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $737.8M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $592.5M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $659.5M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.3M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.0M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.3M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | $69.4M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.4% | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 10.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.03 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.12 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.00 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.12 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.65 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $770.8M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $471.4M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $483.3M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.6M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $413.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.7M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $534.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $498.4M | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $770.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $750.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $758.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $800.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $531.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $549.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $562.6M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RHP
| Food and beverage | $289.3M | 44% |
| Rooms | $223.8M | 34% |
| Entertainment | $79.2M | 12% |
| Other | $72.3M | 11% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
