vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($840.3M vs $664.6M, roughly 1.3× Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.). Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs -31.6%, a 42.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.1% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...
TreeHouse Foods Inc. is a multinational food processing company specializing in producing private label packaged foods headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Created in 2005 and consisting entirely of acquisitions, in 2010 the company had sales of $2 billion and employed over 4,000 people at 20 facilities. Food Processing magazine named TreeHouse Foods their 2010 Processor of the Year, calling them "the biggest company you never heard of". In 2015, the company was the 37th-largest food and bev...
RHP vs THS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $664.6M | $840.3M |
| Net Profit | $69.4M | $-265.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | -30.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | -31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.1% | -7717.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.03 | $-5.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $664.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $737.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $592.5M | $840.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $659.5M | $798.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.3M | $792.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6M | $905.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $550.0M | $839.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.3M | $788.5M |
| Q1 26 | $69.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $-265.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.3M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.8M | $-16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.4% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | -30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | -2.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $-5.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.00 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.12 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.65 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $21.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $770.8M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $6.2B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $471.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $483.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $413.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.7M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $534.9M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $498.4M | $105.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $770.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $750.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $758.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $800.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $531.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $549.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $551.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $562.6M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $38.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.2M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.5M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.2M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.6M | $296.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.1M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.3M | $-19.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.8M | $-42.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -5.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.30× | 5.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RHP
| Food and beverage | $289.3M | 44% |
| Rooms | $223.8M | 34% |
| Entertainment | $79.2M | 12% |
| Other | $72.3M | 11% |
THS
| Retail Grocery Customers | $670.6M | 80% |
| Food Away From Home And Other | $85.3M | 10% |
| Co Manufacturing | $84.4M | 10% |
