vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Regional Management Corp. (RM) and Scienjoy Holding Corp (SJ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Regional Management Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($167.3M vs $91.6M, roughly 1.8× Scienjoy Holding Corp).
Millennium Management LLC is an investment management firm with a multistrategy hedge fund offering. It is one of the world's largest alternative asset management firms with $83.4 billion assets under management as of January 2026. The firm operates in America, Europe and Asia. As of 2022, Millennium had posted the fourth highest net gains of any hedge fund since its inception in 1989.
Scienjoy Holding Corp is a China-based digital entertainment company that principally operates interactive live streaming platforms. It provides diverse content including talent performances, music shows, and lifestyle broadcasts, serving mass consumer audiences of varying age groups across the domestic market, with core business centered on mobile internet entertainment services.
RM vs SJ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $167.3M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $11.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $167.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.4M | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.30 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.86 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $913.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $375.8M | $170.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $199.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $913.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $375.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $373.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.0M | $170.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $357.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $352.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.98× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $309.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.6M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 179.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 170.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.09× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
