vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Regional Management Corp. (RM) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $167.3M, roughly 1.3× Regional Management Corp.). Regional Management Corp. runs the higher net margin — 6.8% vs 5.8%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 8.2%).
Millennium Management LLC is an investment management firm with a multistrategy hedge fund offering. It is one of the world's largest alternative asset management firms with $83.4 billion assets under management as of January 2026. The firm operates in America, Europe and Asia. As of 2022, Millennium had posted the fourth highest net gains of any hedge fund since its inception in 1989.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
RM vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $167.3M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $11.4M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.7% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $167.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $169.7M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.5M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.4M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.0M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.8M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.3M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.0M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.30 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.03 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.86 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $375.8M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $375.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $373.1M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.9M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.0M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $357.9M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.1M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $352.9M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.9M | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.40× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.23× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.14× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.11× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.12× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.94× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.98× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $309.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.7M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.7M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.5M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.3M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.7M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.4M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.3M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 179.3% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 170.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.94× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.04× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.76× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.09× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.13× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.80× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.47× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RM
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
