vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of RAMBUS INC (RMBS) and UP Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RAMBUS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($180.2M vs $107.6M, roughly 1.7× UP Fintech Holding Ltd). RAMBUS INC runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 28.4%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Rambus Inc. is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products. The company, founded in 1990, is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.

UP Fintech Holding Limited, operating under the Tiger Brokers brand, provides online financial services for global Chinese investors. It offers cross-market stock trading (US, Hong Kong, mainland China A-shares), fund management, margin financing and investor education for retail and institutional clients.

RMBS vs TIGR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RMBS
RMBS
1.7× larger
RMBS
$180.2M
$107.6M
TIGR
Higher net margin
RMBS
RMBS
4.8% more per $
RMBS
33.2%
28.4%
TIGR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025

Metric
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Revenue
$180.2M
$107.6M
Net Profit
$59.9M
$30.6M
Gross Margin
79.7%
Operating Margin
34.3%
Net Margin
33.2%
28.4%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
Net Profit YoY
-7.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$0.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
$180.2M
Q4 25
$190.2M
Q3 25
$178.5M
Q2 25
$172.2M
Q1 25
$166.7M
$107.6M
Q4 24
$161.1M
Q3 24
$145.5M
Q2 24
$132.1M
$166.4M
Net Profit
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
$59.9M
Q4 25
$63.8M
Q3 25
$48.4M
Q2 25
$57.9M
Q1 25
$60.3M
$30.6M
Q4 24
$62.2M
Q3 24
$48.7M
Q2 24
$36.1M
$15.2M
Gross Margin
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
79.7%
Q4 25
78.9%
Q3 25
79.5%
Q2 25
79.8%
Q1 25
80.3%
Q4 24
80.4%
Q3 24
80.7%
Q2 24
79.7%
Operating Margin
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
34.3%
Q4 25
37.2%
Q3 25
35.4%
Q2 25
36.6%
Q1 25
37.9%
Q4 24
35.9%
Q3 24
37.6%
Q2 24
30.5%
14.0%
Net Margin
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
33.2%
Q4 25
33.6%
Q3 25
27.1%
Q2 25
33.6%
Q1 25
36.2%
28.4%
Q4 24
38.6%
Q3 24
33.4%
Q2 24
27.3%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
$0.55
Q4 25
$0.58
Q3 25
$0.44
Q2 25
$0.53
Q1 25
$0.56
$0.01
Q4 24
$0.57
Q3 24
$0.45
Q2 24
$0.33
$0.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$134.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
Total Assets
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
$134.3M
Q4 25
$182.8M
Q3 25
$79.2M
Q2 25
$87.8M
Q1 25
$132.2M
Q4 24
$99.8M
Q3 24
$114.0M
Q2 24
$124.6M
$392.5M
Stockholders' Equity
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.4B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.0B
$501.2M
Total Assets
RMBS
RMBS
TIGR
TIGR
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$4.8B

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

RMBS
RMBS

Product revenue$88.0M49%
Royalties$69.6M39%
Contract and other revenue$22.6M13%

TIGR
TIGR

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons