vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROGERS CORP (ROG) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.5× STRATASYS LTD.). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -40.6%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -2.2%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ROGERS CORP's revenue compounded faster (-3.3% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
ROG vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.5M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 32.2% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.2% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 421.4% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.8M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.5M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.3M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.2M | $138.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.6M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-500.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.5% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.1% | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | -18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.3% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $195.8M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $195.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $197.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.8M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.2M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $175.6M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.4M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.9M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $850.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $70.1M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $-2.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
