vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ROKU, INC (ROKU) and RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ (RUSHA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× ROKU, INC). ROKU, INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 3.7%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROKU, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.1% vs -9.0%). RUSH ENTERPRISES INC \TX\ produced more free cash flow last quarter ($411.6M vs $106.6M). Over the past eight quarters, ROKU, INC's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs -6.8%).

Roku, Inc. is an American streaming technology company. Founded in 2002 by Anthony Wood, it produces digital media players and TVs, distributes streaming services and operates an ad business on its platform. Roku is the U.S. market leader in streaming video distribution, reaching 145 million people as of 2024. The company also operates in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the U.K., and Latin America.

Rush Enterprises is an American commercial vehicle dealership headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas. It primarily sells new and used trucks, through its Rush Truck Centers. In 2019, the company operated over 200 Rush Truck Centers in 20 U.S. states as well as 14 locations in Canada. As of 2020, it was a Fortune 500 corporation.

ROKU vs RUSHA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RUSHA
RUSHA
1.2× larger
RUSHA
$1.7B
$1.4B
ROKU
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ROKU
ROKU
+25.1% gap
ROKU
16.1%
-9.0%
RUSHA
Higher net margin
ROKU
ROKU
2.1% more per $
ROKU
5.8%
3.7%
RUSHA
More free cash flow
RUSHA
RUSHA
$305.0M more FCF
RUSHA
$411.6M
$106.6M
ROKU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ROKU
ROKU
Annualised
ROKU
25.8%
-6.8%
RUSHA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$80.5M
$61.7M
Gross Margin
43.5%
20.4%
Operating Margin
4.7%
4.9%
Net Margin
5.8%
3.7%
Revenue YoY
16.1%
-9.0%
Net Profit YoY
326.4%
1.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.55
$0.77

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$968.2M
$1.9B
Net Profit
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$61.7M
Q4 25
$80.5M
$64.3M
Q3 25
$24.8M
$66.7M
Q2 25
$10.5M
$72.4M
Q1 25
$-27.4M
$60.3M
Q4 24
$-35.5M
$74.8M
Q3 24
$-9.0M
$79.1M
Q2 24
$-34.0M
$78.7M
Gross Margin
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
20.4%
Q4 25
43.5%
20.8%
Q3 25
43.4%
21.0%
Q2 25
44.8%
20.7%
Q1 25
43.6%
20.3%
Q4 24
42.7%
19.3%
Q3 24
45.2%
21.0%
Q2 24
43.9%
20.2%
Operating Margin
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
4.9%
Q4 25
4.7%
5.5%
Q3 25
0.8%
5.6%
Q2 25
-2.1%
6.0%
Q1 25
-5.7%
5.2%
Q4 24
-3.3%
5.8%
Q3 24
-3.4%
6.7%
Q2 24
-7.4%
6.4%
Net Margin
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
3.7%
Q4 25
5.8%
3.8%
Q3 25
2.0%
3.7%
Q2 25
0.9%
3.9%
Q1 25
-2.7%
3.4%
Q4 24
-3.0%
3.9%
Q3 24
-0.9%
4.4%
Q2 24
-3.5%
4.1%
EPS (diluted)
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$0.77
Q4 25
$0.55
$0.81
Q3 25
$0.16
$0.83
Q2 25
$0.07
$0.90
Q1 25
$-0.19
$0.73
Q4 24
$-0.24
$-95.13
Q3 24
$-0.06
$0.97
Q2 24
$-0.24
$97.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$277.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$2.3B
Total Assets
$4.4B
$4.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.12×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.3B
$212.6M
Q3 25
$2.3B
$242.0M
Q2 25
$2.3B
$211.1M
Q1 25
$2.3B
$228.7M
Q4 24
$2.2B
$228.1M
Q3 24
$2.1B
$185.1M
Q2 24
$2.1B
$167.3M
Total Debt
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$277.8M
Q4 25
$274.8M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$408.4M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$2.7B
$2.2B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$2.0B
Total Assets
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$4.5B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$4.4B
$4.6B
Q2 25
$4.3B
$4.7B
Q1 25
$4.2B
$4.7B
Q4 24
$4.3B
$4.6B
Q3 24
$4.3B
$4.6B
Q2 24
$4.1B
$4.5B
Debt / Equity
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
0.12×
Q4 25
0.12×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.19×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$107.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$106.6M
$411.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.6%
24.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.34×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$478.4M
$828.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
$107.7M
$112.9M
Q3 25
$127.6M
$367.8M
Q2 25
$109.7M
$227.6M
Q1 25
$138.7M
$153.5M
Q4 24
$79.3M
$392.3M
Q3 24
$68.7M
$111.7M
Q2 24
$23.4M
$270.6M
Free Cash Flow
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
$411.6M
Q4 25
$106.6M
$31.9M
Q3 25
$126.5M
$271.2M
Q2 25
$108.6M
$113.8M
Q1 25
$136.8M
$45.1M
Q4 24
$76.8M
$263.5M
Q3 24
$67.6M
$-20.0M
Q2 24
$22.5M
$177.2M
FCF Margin
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
24.4%
Q4 25
7.6%
1.9%
Q3 25
10.4%
15.2%
Q2 25
9.8%
6.2%
Q1 25
13.4%
2.6%
Q4 24
6.4%
13.7%
Q3 24
6.4%
-1.1%
Q2 24
2.3%
9.1%
Capex Intensity
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
2.0%
Q4 25
0.1%
4.8%
Q3 25
0.1%
5.4%
Q2 25
0.1%
6.2%
Q1 25
0.2%
6.2%
Q4 24
0.2%
6.7%
Q3 24
0.1%
7.3%
Q2 24
0.1%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
ROKU
ROKU
RUSHA
RUSHA
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.34×
1.75×
Q3 25
5.14×
5.51×
Q2 25
10.45×
3.14×
Q1 25
2.55×
Q4 24
5.25×
Q3 24
1.41×
Q2 24
3.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ROKU
ROKU

Services$1.2B88%
Products$170.9M12%

RUSHA
RUSHA

New and used commercial vehicle sales$955.1M57%
Aftermarket products and services sales$627.2M37%
Lease and rental sales$92.3M5%
Finance and insurance$5.6M0%

Related Comparisons