vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) and XCF Global, Inc. (SAFX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XCF Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.6M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.5× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -131.0%, a 189.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
ROLR vs SAFX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.3M | $9.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.7M | $-12.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | -90.3% |
| Net Margin | 58.4% | -131.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -16.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 831.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-592.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-501.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -90.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.39 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7M | $879.2K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $122.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.6M | $5.2M |
| Total Assets | $16.0M | $408.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 23.55× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $879.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $122.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-779.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $408.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 23.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-78.0K | $-13.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-90.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-78.0K | $-13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-840.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-90.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-845.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
SAFX
Segment breakdown not available.
