vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RANGE RESOURCES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($786.9M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.5× TIC Solutions, Inc.). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs -9.3%, a 32.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
RRC vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $786.9M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $179.1M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 94.5% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 88.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.75 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $786.9M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.3M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.6M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $846.3M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $179.1M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.3M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 94.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.5% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 95.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 93.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 94.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 94.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.60 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.38 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $204.0K | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $204.0K | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0K | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.0K | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.6M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $304.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $343.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.5M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $257.5M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $330.1M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $331.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
