vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC) and UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RANGE RESOURCES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($786.9M vs $340.0M, roughly 2.3× UL Solutions Inc.). On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs -12.4%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs -31.8%).
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
The UL enterprise is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions.
RRC vs ULS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $786.9M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $179.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 94.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.4% |
| Net Margin | 22.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 18.0% | -12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 88.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.75 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $786.9M | $789.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.3M | $783.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.6M | $776.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $846.3M | $705.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.9M | $731.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.2M | $730.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $179.1M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.3M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.1M | $67.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.8M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.7M | $101.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 94.5% | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 95.0% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 93.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.7% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 94.3% | 49.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 93.4% | 50.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.75 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.60 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.40 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $204.0K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0K | $295.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0K | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.0K | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.6M | $267.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $304.5M | $298.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.4M | $327.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.1M | $295.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $491.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $544.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $608.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $653.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $742.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $797.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $810.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $970.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $904.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $872.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $769.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.44× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.44× | 1.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $257.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.5M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.5M | $155.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.2M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $330.1M | $154.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.9M | $130.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.9M | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $103.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.40× | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.30× | 1.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.85× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.18× | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
ULS
Segment breakdown not available.
