vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RELIANCE, INC. (RS) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $3.5B, roughly 1.1× RELIANCE, INC.). RELIANCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs 1.4%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RELIANCE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 0.1%). RELIANCE, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($202.9M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Stanley Black & Decker's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -2.0%).
Reliance, Inc. (Reliance), headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, is the largest metals service center operator in North America. The company provides metals processing services and distributes a line of approximately 100,000 metal products, including aluminum, brass, alloy, copper, carbon steel, stainless steel, titanium, and specialty metal products to 125,000 customers such as fabricators and manufacturers.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
RS vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $116.9M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.23 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.5M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.5M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.2M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.3M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.8M | $19.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.8% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $2.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.59 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.74 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.05 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.61 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.67 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.23 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $216.6M | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.2B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $10.4B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.2M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $239.5M | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.8M | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.1M | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.6M | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $350.8M | $318.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.9M | $476.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | $8.9B |
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7B | $23.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $276.1M | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $202.9M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.8% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.36× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $502.5M | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $276.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.3M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $463.9M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $366.3M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.3M | $-431.0M |
| Q4 25 | $202.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.6M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.4M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.1M | $485.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $-496.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | -12.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.38× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.47× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | -22.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RS
| Carbon Steel | $1.9B | 55% |
| Aluminum | $624.5M | 18% |
| Stainless Steel | $467.1M | 13% |
| Alloy Steel | $155.5M | 4% |
| Toll Processing | $155.3M | 4% |
| Copper And Brass | $93.5M | 3% |
| Other Products Or Services | $80.4M | 2% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
