vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RELIANCE, INC. (RS) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $3.5B, roughly 1.1× RELIANCE, INC.). RELIANCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -4.8%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RELIANCE, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 2.2%).
Reliance, Inc. (Reliance), headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, is the largest metals service center operator in North America. The company provides metals processing services and distributes a line of approximately 100,000 metal products, including aluminum, brass, alloy, copper, carbon steel, stainless steel, titanium, and specialty metal products to 125,000 customers such as fabricators and manufacturers.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
RS vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $116.9M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.2M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.3M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.59 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.74 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $216.6M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.2B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $10.4B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $239.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $350.8M | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $934.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $276.1M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $202.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $502.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $276.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.0M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $463.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $366.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $202.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RS
| Carbon Steel | $1.9B | 55% |
| Aluminum | $624.5M | 18% |
| Stainless Steel | $467.1M | 13% |
| Alloy Steel | $155.5M | 4% |
| Toll Processing | $155.3M | 4% |
| Copper And Brass | $93.5M | 3% |
| Other Products Or Services | $80.4M | 2% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.