vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RxSight, Inc. (RXST) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.6M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.4× RxSight, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -28.1%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs -18.9%).
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
RXST vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-9.2M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 77.5% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -18.9% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.1% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.3M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.2M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.9M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 77.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.8% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -34.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.1% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -41.6% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.2% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.5% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.1% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -32.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.0% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.6% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.8% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.9% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.1M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $275.7M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $311.8M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $228.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $227.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $237.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $275.7M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $276.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $278.0M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.3M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.2M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $311.8M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $308.5M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $313.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.6M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.5M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $183.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.1M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-19.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.8M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $650.0K | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-453.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
