vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rackspace Technology, Inc. (RXT) and Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. (TPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($972.6M vs $682.8M, roughly 1.4× Rackspace Technology, Inc.). Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.2% vs -4.8%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rackspace Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.4% vs -22.4%). Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($213.2M vs $56.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tri Pointe Homes, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Rackspace Technology, Inc. is an American cloud computing company based in San Antonio, Texas. It also has offices in Reston, Virginia, as well as in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, India, Dubai, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Mexico, Toronto and Hong Kong. Its data centers are located in Amsterdam (Netherlands), Virginia (USA), Chicago (USA), Dallas (USA), London (UK), Frankfurt (Germany), Hong Kong (China), Kansas City (USA), New York City (USA), San Jose (USA), Shangh...
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is a home construction company headquartered in Incline Village, Nevada. It also offers financing and insurance services to homebuyers. It operates in Arizona, California, Nevada, Washington, Colorado, Texas, the District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The company is the 18th largest home construction company in the United States based on the number of homes closed.
RXT vs TPH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $682.8M | $972.6M |
| Net Profit | $-32.7M | $60.2M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Margin | -4.8% | 6.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.4% | -22.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 41.6% | -53.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.13 | $0.70 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $682.8M | $972.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $671.2M | $854.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $666.3M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $665.4M | $740.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $685.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $675.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $684.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $690.8M | $939.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.7M | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.1M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-54.5M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.5M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.0M | $129.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-186.6M | $111.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-640.6M | $99.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.7% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -94.5% | 12.3% |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.7% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.13 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $0.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.31 | $0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.20 | $1.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.82 | $1.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.91 | $1.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $105.8M | $982.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-1.2B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $5.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $105.8M | $982.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.9M | $622.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.0M | $812.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.0M | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.1M | $676.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.2M | $492.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.6M | $944.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $646.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-949.7M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-756.2M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-787.2M | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.7M | $221.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.0M | $213.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 21.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $90.6M | $128.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $59.7M | $221.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $-74.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $-31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.1M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-90.3M | $144.7M |
| Q4 25 | $56.0M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $-84.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $-39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $355.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-118.4M | $138.3M |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.1% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.96× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RXT
| Public Cloud Services Segment | $442.2M | 65% |
| Private Cloud Service Segment | $240.6M | 35% |
TPH
| West | $547.8M | 56% |
| Central | $245.1M | 25% |
| East | $161.8M | 17% |
| Financial Services Segment | $18.0M | 2% |
| Land | $7.9M | 1% |
