vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sezzle Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $57.3M, roughly 1.4× RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). Sezzle Inc. runs the higher net margin — 54.6% vs -83.0%, a 137.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs 36.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (76.0% CAGR vs 48.5%).
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
RYTM vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.3M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-47.5M | $42.7M |
| Gross Margin | 91.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.2% | 70.6% |
| Net Margin | -83.0% | 54.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 36.9% | 61.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.6% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.73 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $57.3M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.7M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.8M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.3M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.1M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.0M | $25.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.5M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-43.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.6M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.3M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-141.4M | $8.0M |
| Q4 25 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -82.2% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.6% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -93.4% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -143.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -98.6% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -132.0% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -139.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -538.7% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | -83.0% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -103.1% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -96.1% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -151.4% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -103.6% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -131.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -110.9% | 98.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -544.4% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.73 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.82 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.75 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.81 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.71 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.73 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.55 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.35 | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $388.9M | $64.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.1M | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $480.2M | $400.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $388.9M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $416.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $291.0M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $314.5M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $320.6M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $201.2M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | $139.1M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.8M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.2M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.3M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.6M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $480.2M | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $506.9M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $372.7M | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.7M | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.3M | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.6M | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.8M | $212.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.7M | $195.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-25.4M | $70.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $70.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 90.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $209.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-25.4M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.3M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-40.4M | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-29.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.7M | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 110.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 108.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 118.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 98.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
RYTM
Segment breakdown not available.
SEZL
| Merchant And Partner Income | $28.9M | 37% |
| Transaction Income | $25.9M | 33% |
| Income From Other Services Late Payment Fees | $20.5M | 26% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
