vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SentinelOne, Inc. (S) and Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.6M vs $258.9M, roughly 1.5× SentinelOne, Inc.). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs -23.3%, a 34.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.7% vs 22.9%). Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($402.6M vs $20.9M).
SentinelOne, Inc. is an American cybersecurity company listed on NYSE based in Mountain View, California. The company was founded in 2013 by Tomer Weingarten, Almog Cohen and Ehud ("Udi") Shamir. Weingarten acts as the company's CEO. The company has approximately 2,800 employees and offices in Mountain View, Boston, Prague, Tokyo, and Tel Aviv. The company uses machine learning for monitoring personal computers, IoT devices, and cloud workloads. The company's platform utilizes a heuristic mod...
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is a specialty property and casualty insurance provider offering tailored coverage solutions including commercial auto, general liability, professional indemnity, and specialty property policies. It primarily serves small-to-medium enterprises and niche industry segments across the United States, focusing on underwriting complex, hard-to-place risks for underserved client groups.
S vs SKWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $258.9M | $385.6M |
| Net Profit | $-60.3M | $43.2M |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -28.3% | 14.2% |
| Net Margin | -23.3% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.9% | 26.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.1% | 200.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $258.9M | $385.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.2M | $382.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.0M | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $328.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-60.3M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-72.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-208.2M | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q4 25 | 73.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -28.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -38.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.7% |
| Q4 25 | -23.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -90.9% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.22 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.63 | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $649.8M | $168.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $649.8M | $168.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $810.8M | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $766.9M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $961.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $899.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $850.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $797.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $723.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $692.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.0M | $408.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.9M | $402.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.1% | 104.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $755.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $408.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.3M |
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $402.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.1M | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 104.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
S
| US | $154.8M | 60% |
| Non Us | $104.1M | 40% |
SKWD
Segment breakdown not available.
