vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP (SEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP). SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.5% vs 4.2%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.0% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Select Medical is a healthcare company based in Pennsylvania. It owns long-term acute care and inpatient rehabilitation hospitals, as well as occupational health and physical therapy clinics. Select Medical is a subsidiary of Select Medical Holdings, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
SAIC vs SEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $63.8M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | -14.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $77.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $25.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $6.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 0.88× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $26.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $111.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $7.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 2.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $64.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $110.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $125.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $278.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $122.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-55.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $130.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $222.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 17.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 2.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 3.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
SEM
Segment breakdown not available.
