vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.7× Science Applications International Corp). Molson Coors Beverage Company runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 4.2%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -3.6%). Molson Coors Beverage Company produced more free cash flow last quarter ($357.8M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
SAIC vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $207.8M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $2.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $0.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $896.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $6.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $458.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $13.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $27.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $26.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $540.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $357.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 11.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 2.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $869.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $25.4M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $691.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $-189.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 0.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.