vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and TIMKEN CO (TKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× TIMKEN CO). TIMKEN CO runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs 4.2%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TIMKEN CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.5% vs 2.6%). TIMKEN CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.7M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
The Timken Company is a global manufacturer of engineered bearings and industrial motion products. Headquartered in North Canton, Ohio, the company operates from 45 countries.
SAIC vs TKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $62.3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 29.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 3.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | -12.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $69.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $78.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $81.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $103.5M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $1.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $1.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $364.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $6.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $449.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $419.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $376.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $373.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $412.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $469.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $421.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 0.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $183.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $140.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 2.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $406.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $183.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $201.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $111.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $178.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $123.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $124.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $49.3M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $163.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $78.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $88.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 2.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 2.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 0.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
TKR
| Industrial Motion | $574.1M | 52% |
| Other | $536.9M | 48% |
