vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.3× Science Applications International Corp). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 4.2%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 2.6%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
SAIC vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
