vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.5× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs -35.0%, a 39.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -0.7%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
SAIC vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
