vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Science Applications International Corp (SAIC) and Wynn Resorts (WYNN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Science Applications International Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.0× Wynn Resorts). Wynn Resorts runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs 4.2%, a 1.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 1.5%). Wynn Resorts produced more free cash flow last quarter ($306.8M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Science Applications International Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
Wynn Resorts, Limited is an American publicly traded corporation based in Paradise, Nevada, that is a developer and operator of high-end hotels and casinos. It was founded in 2002 by former Mirage Resorts Chairman and CEO Steve Wynn and is now run by CEO Craig Billings. As of 2020, the company has developed six properties.
SAIC vs WYNN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $78.0M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 14.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | -63.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.0M | $66.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $72.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.0M | $277.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $144.2M |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.42 | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $2.43 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.58 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.77 | $1.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $10.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $-275.5M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $13.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.64× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $10.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $10.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $11.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-275.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-370.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-441.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-360.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-224.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-281.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $-109.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $-137.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $14.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $13.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.0M | $478.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $120.0M | $306.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 16.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | 4.78× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $478.0M | $692.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $478.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $335.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $405.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $133.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.0M | $479.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $279.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.0M | $352.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.0M | $315.1M |
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $306.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $171.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $239.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.0M | $351.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.0M | $178.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $259.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | $217.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | 4.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 6.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.62× | 2.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
WYNN
| Casino | $1.1B | 61% |
| Occupancy | $305.1M | 16% |
| Food And Beverage | $264.9M | 14% |
| Entertainment Retail And Other | $152.6M | 8% |
