vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) and TEJON RANCH CO (TRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.0M vs $21.1M, roughly 1.5× TEJON RANCH CO). TEJON RANCH CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -0.4%, a 7.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEJON RANCH CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, TEJON RANCH CO's revenue compounded faster (68.8% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Tejon Ranch Company, based in Lebec, California, is one of the largest private landowners in California. The company was incorporated in 1936 to organize the ownership of a large tract of land that was consolidated from four Mexican land grants acquired in the 1850s and 1860s by ranch founder Edward Fitzgerald Beale.
SAMG vs TRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.0M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $-120.0K | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.8% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.0% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -107.4% | -64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.0M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.3M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $618.0K | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $957.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $-914.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -2.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | -48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | -50.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | -62.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | -53.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.9% | -12.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.1M | $9.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $50.3M | $475.2M |
| Total Assets | $166.6M | $630.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.1M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.7M | $35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.9M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.6M | $471.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.0M | $472.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.7M | $473.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | $468.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.3M | $469.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.9M | $467.4M |
| Q4 25 | $166.6M | $630.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $157.6M | $629.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.7M | $618.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $614.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.4M | $608.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.2M | $598.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.6M | $590.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $170.2M | $581.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.6M | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 46.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.6M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.1M | $777.0K |
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.9M | $-42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.7M | $-7.3M |
| Q4 25 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.1% | -122.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.6% | -240.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -80.0% | -230.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.2% | -239.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | -155.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.4% | -277.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -81.6% | -99.0% |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 102.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 236.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 213.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 319.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 174.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 245.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 109.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.62× | -1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.34× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.90× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.00× | -1.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SAMG
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $30.7M | 96% |
| Tax And Family Office Services | $1.2M | 4% |
TRC
Segment breakdown not available.
