vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of StableX Technologies, Inc. (SBLX) and Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cambricon Technologies is a partially state-owned publicly listed Chinese technology company headquartered in Beijing.
Youxin Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive digital service provider. It operates used car trading platforms, offers new car sales support, auto financing referrals, and after-sales resource matching for consumers and auto industry participants across mainland China, focusing on optimizing vehicle transaction efficiency.
SBLX vs YAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $39.4K |
| Net Profit | $-5.6M | $-127.9K |
| Gross Margin | — | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | -324.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-29.00 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $39.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $157.9K | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $139.5K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $113.1K | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $608.9K | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $373.2K | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-127.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-5.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 67.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -2655.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -137.9% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -78.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -155.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -6239.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -4490.7% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -5127.3% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -1139.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1555.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -324.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -6391.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -4302.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -4842.2% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -1100.4% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1522.5% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-2.75 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.28 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-1.17 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-1.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7M | $-374.6K |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $132.2K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $41.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $55.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-374.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $46.8M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $58.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $132.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $52.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $43.5M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $55.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $62.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.0M | $-88.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-3.1M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-3.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -3132.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -6347.4% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -6461.9% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -1049.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -987.2% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 42.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 358.4% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 682.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 101.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 149.1% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
