vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SHOE CARNIVAL INC (SCVL) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $297.2M, roughly 1.4× SHOE CARNIVAL INC). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 4.9%, a 43.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -3.2%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $19.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 3.0%).
SHOE CARNIVAL INCSCVLEarnings & Financial Report
Shoe Carnival Inc. is an American retailer of family footwear. The company operates 429 stores throughout the midwest, south, and southeast regions, and Puerto Rico. It was founded by David Russell in 1978 and is headquartered in Fort Mill, South Carolina as of 2025.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
SCVL vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $297.2M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $14.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.3% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.9% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.53 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $297.2M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.4M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.9M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.9M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $332.7M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $300.4M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.2M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.8% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.5% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.9% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.0% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.7M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $683.2M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.7M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.9M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.0M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.1M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.1M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.5M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.2M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $683.2M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.7M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $649.0M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $635.7M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.5M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $597.8M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $583.4M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.6M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.7M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.30× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $35.1M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.6M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.6M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.1M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.4M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.0M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.2M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.7M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.3% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.5% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.30× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.03× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.04× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.05× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.99× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.44× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
