vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SCYNEXIS INC (SCYX) and UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST (UHT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.5M vs $18.6M, roughly 1.3× SCYNEXIS INC). SCYNEXIS INC runs the higher net margin — 65.7% vs 17.7%, a 48.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SCYNEXIS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1808.5% vs -0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, SCYNEXIS INC's revenue compounded faster (268.5% CAGR vs -1.3%).
SCYNEXIS Inc. is a biotechnology company focused on developing innovative antifungal therapies to address unmet medical needs for difficult-to-treat fungal infections. It targets hospital and specialty care markets, with key product candidates serving immunocompromised patients and other high-risk groups.
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.
SCYX vs UHT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.6M | $24.5M |
| Net Profit | $12.3M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 56.3% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 65.7% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1808.5% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 376.5% | -7.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.0K | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $257.0K | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.0K | $24.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $660.0K | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $736.0K | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.4M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $411.0K | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | 56.3% | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2516.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -701.0% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3350.2% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1563.6% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1255.0% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -692.5% | 37.6% |
| Q4 25 | 65.7% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2572.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -504.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2097.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -425.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1964.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.9% | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.0M | $6.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $374.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.4M | $152.4M |
| Total Assets | $59.0M | $564.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.8M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $374.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $368.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $49.4M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.4M | $158.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.5M | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $172.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.1M | $179.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5M | $181.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $190.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.1M | $196.5M |
| Q4 25 | $59.0M | $564.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.9M | $573.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $580.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | $584.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.8M | $586.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.3M | $596.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.4M | $49.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.50× | 11.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $765.0K | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 11.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.75× | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SCYX
| Glaxosmithkline Intellectual Property | $17.2M | 92% |
| Products | $1.4M | 8% |
UHT
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $23.1M | 94% |
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $2.3M | 9% |
