vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD) and Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.6M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.5× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -1.3%, a 56.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vitesse Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -2.1%).
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas assets. It operates primarily in high-potential onshore basins including North Dakota's Williston Basin, serving domestic and global upstream energy market demand.
SD vs VTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.4M | $58.6M |
| Net Profit | $21.6M | $-739.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 38.5% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | 54.9% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.1% | 85.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.59 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $39.4M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.8M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.5M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | $66.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.0M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.1M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3M | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $-739.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1M | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 38.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | 54.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.6% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.8% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.7% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.46 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.69 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $510.9M | $629.3M |
| Total Assets | $644.0M | $893.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $510.9M | $629.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $492.4M | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.2M | $671.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.9M | $667.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.5M | $500.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $446.8M | $520.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.8M | $518.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $419.7M | $522.7M |
| Q4 25 | $644.0M | $893.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $619.0M | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.3M | $951.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.3M | $975.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.5M | $810.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $565.2M | $791.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $529.6M | $778.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $527.4M | $749.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.7M | $37.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 36.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.8M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | 6.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.82× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
VTS
| Oil Reserves | $54.5M | 93% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $4.2M | 7% |
