vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.1× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 1.4%, a 9.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -9.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
SDHC vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.4M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.5M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.3% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $260.4M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.9M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.7M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.9M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.7M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $557.6M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.8M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.9M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.1M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.7M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $557.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1M | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $429.3M | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $401.3M | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.4% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.9M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0K | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.3M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.1M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.1% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.70× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.24× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.01× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.12× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
