vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.6× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 1.4%, a 47.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -9.4%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
SDHC vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $260.4M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.5M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.4% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.3% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $260.4M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.0M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.9M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.7M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.8M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $220.9M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.8% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.5% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $86.7M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $557.6M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.8M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.2M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.0M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.9M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.1M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.7M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $557.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $570.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $429.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $401.3M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.8M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.4% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.9M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-34.9M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.9M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0K | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.3M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-31.1M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.9M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.9% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.0% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.1% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.70× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.24× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.01× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.28× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.12× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.