vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. (SEI) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($196.2M vs $151.7M, roughly 1.3× Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -5.5%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 63.0%).

AGL Energy Ltd is an Australian listed public company involved in both the generation and retailing of electricity and gas for residential and commercial use. It is one of the "big three" retailers in the National Electricity Market. AGL is Australia's largest electricity generator, and the nation's largest carbon emitter.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

SEI vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SEI
SEI
1.3× larger
SEI
$196.2M
$151.7M
TARS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+119.2% gap
TARS
128.4%
9.2%
SEI
Higher net margin
SEI
SEI
21.9% more per $
SEI
16.3%
-5.5%
TARS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
63.0%
SEI

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$196.2M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$32.1M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
25.8%
-5.3%
Net Margin
16.3%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
9.2%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
1013.5%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.32
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$196.2M
Q4 25
$179.7M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$166.8M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$149.3M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$126.3M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$96.3M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$75.0M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$73.9M
$40.8M
Net Profit
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$32.1M
Q4 25
$-1.7M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$14.6M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$12.0M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$5.3M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$6.3M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-968.0K
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$6.2M
$-33.3M
Operating Margin
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
25.8%
Q4 25
22.2%
-5.3%
Q3 25
22.7%
-12.2%
Q2 25
23.8%
-21.6%
Q1 25
17.5%
-33.5%
Q4 24
26.7%
-36.8%
Q3 24
7.0%
-52.3%
Q2 24
16.0%
-81.6%
Net Margin
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
16.3%
Q4 25
-0.9%
-5.5%
Q3 25
8.7%
-10.6%
Q2 25
8.0%
-19.8%
Q1 25
4.2%
-32.1%
Q4 24
6.5%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-1.3%
-48.7%
Q2 24
8.4%
-81.6%
EPS (diluted)
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$0.32
Q4 25
$-0.17
Q3 25
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.48
Q1 25
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.88

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$344.5M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$395.4M
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$343.4M
Total Assets
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$344.5M
Q4 25
$353.3M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$106.7M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$99.6M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$16.7M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$114.3M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$18.6M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$5.1M
$323.6M
Total Debt
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$395.4M
Q4 25
$184.0M
$72.4M
Q3 25
$382.8M
$72.3M
Q2 25
$386.2M
$72.1M
Q1 25
$316.2M
$72.0M
Q4 24
$315.7M
$71.8M
Q3 24
$315.3M
$71.7M
Q2 24
$71.6M
Stockholders' Equity
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$564.3M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$546.6M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$399.1M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$361.3M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$355.6M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$221.7M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$204.6M
$252.2M
Total Assets
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.1B
$562.2M
Q3 25
$1.6B
$534.6M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$495.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$500.8M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$377.0M
Q3 24
$939.5M
$376.3M
Q2 24
$457.8M
$376.8M
Debt / Equity
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.33×
0.21×
Q3 25
0.70×
0.22×
Q2 25
0.97×
0.22×
Q1 25
0.88×
0.21×
Q4 24
0.89×
0.32×
Q3 24
1.42×
0.30×
Q2 24
0.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
175.0%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$95.9M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$63.3M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$24.2M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$25.7M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$13.1M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$10.5M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$18.9M
$-14.4M
Free Cash Flow
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-158.6M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$462.0K
$16.3M
Q2 25
$-160.9M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$-118.6M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$-113.6M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$-47.2M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$18.2M
$-15.4M
FCF Margin
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-88.2%
8.6%
Q3 25
0.3%
13.8%
Q2 25
-107.8%
-29.6%
Q1 25
-93.9%
-27.1%
Q4 24
-117.9%
-33.5%
Q3 24
-63.0%
-18.6%
Q2 24
24.7%
-37.8%
Capex Intensity
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
175.0%
Q4 25
141.6%
4.2%
Q3 25
37.6%
1.6%
Q2 25
124.0%
1.0%
Q1 25
114.2%
0.8%
Q4 24
131.5%
0.1%
Q3 24
77.0%
0.6%
Q2 24
0.9%
2.5%
Cash Conversion
SEI
SEI
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
4.35×
Q2 25
2.02×
Q1 25
4.83×
Q4 24
2.10×
Q3 24
Q2 24
3.04×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SEI
SEI

Leasing revenue$105.4M54%
Service revenue$90.9M46%

TARS
TARS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons