vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) and TScan Therapeutics, Inc. (TCRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Self Storage, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.2M vs $2.6M, roughly 1.2× TScan Therapeutics, Inc.). Global Self Storage, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -895.1%, a 905.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TScan Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (286.0% vs -0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Global Self Storage, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs -9.7%).
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
TScan Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel T cell receptor (TCR) immunotherapies for hard-to-treat cancers. Its proprietary platform identifies high-affinity naturally occurring TCRs targeting tumor antigens, with pipeline candidates spanning hematological malignancies and solid tumors, operating in the global oncology therapeutics market.
SELF vs TCRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.2M | $2.6M |
| Net Profit | $322.8K | $-23.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | -929.4% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -895.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.9% | 286.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 282.5% | 35.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $322.8K | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $496.3K | $-35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.2K | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $555.2K | $-34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $-29.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $591.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | -929.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -1475.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -1256.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | -1669.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | -3109.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.2% | -895.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -1422.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | -1201.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.8% | -1571.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.9% | -2849.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.4M | $152.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $32.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $46.5M | $123.1M |
| Total Assets | $64.1M | $228.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $184.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $218.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $251.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $271.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $46.5M | $123.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.9M | $144.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $176.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.3M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.1M | $229.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $228.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $262.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $298.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.1M | $332.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.3M | $348.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.5M | $-32.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-32.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1253.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.86× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-139.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $797.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-33.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-39.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1253.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1349.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1123.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1801.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2792.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 130.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.86× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.99× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
