vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) and China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SXTC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Serve Robotics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($881.5K vs $829.5K, roughly 1.1× China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -96.8% vs -3888.1%, a 3791.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs 0.0%). China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-46.1M).
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a pharmaceutical company focused on the Chinese domestic market. It engages in the research, development, production and distribution of traditional Chinese medicine-based prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, and nutritional health products, serving both clinical medical institutions and consumer health markets.
SERV vs SXTC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $881.5K | $829.5K |
| Net Profit | $-34.3M | $-802.6K |
| Gross Margin | -757.3% | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4572.1% | -76.9% |
| Net Margin | -3888.1% | -96.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 400.1% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -161.3% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $881.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $687.0K | $829.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0K | $829.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $468.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.0M | $-802.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.0M | $-802.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -757.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.4% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -445.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -333.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -371.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4572.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5067.8% | -76.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3527.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3406.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7701.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3804.1% | -76.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1828.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -814.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3888.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4806.4% | -96.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3000.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7441.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3601.8% | -96.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1931.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -954.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.2M | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $105.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $350.7M | $15.4M |
| Total Assets | $367.8M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $952.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $350.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $367.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.1M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $31.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-29.6M | $-1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.1M | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5234.4% | -216.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1872.1% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-117.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-29.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-46.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -5234.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5314.1% | -216.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3426.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2934.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6307.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4529.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1396.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -431.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1872.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1649.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 940.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 785.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2755.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2070.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 169.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
