vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Serve Robotics Inc. /DE/ (SERV) and Viomi Technology Co., Ltd (VIOT), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
YI Technology, also known as Xiaoyi in Mainland China markets, is a company that manufactures cameras and computer vision technologies. Some of the company's popular camera models include the YI 1080p Home Camera, and the YI Outdoor Security Camera. YI Technology was originally backed and branded by Xiaomi, but in October 2016, YI split off from Xiaomi, dropping the "Xiaomi Yi" branding.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $881.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $687.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $468.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -757.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -445.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -333.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -371.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4572.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5067.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3527.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3406.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7701.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3804.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1828.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -814.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3888.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4806.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3000.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7441.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3601.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1931.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -954.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
