vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) and 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
17 Education & Technology Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2M vs $881.5K, roughly 1.3× Serve Robotics Inc.). 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — -29.2% vs -3888.1%, a 3858.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...
SERV vs YQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $881.5K | $1.2M |
| Net Profit | $-34.3M | $-342.2K |
| Gross Margin | -757.3% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4572.1% | -36.3% |
| Net Margin | -3888.1% | -29.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 400.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -161.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $881.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $687.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $468.0K | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.0M | $-342.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -757.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -445.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -333.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -371.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.3% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4572.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5067.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3527.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3406.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7701.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3804.1% | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1828.2% | -89.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -814.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3888.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4806.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3000.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7441.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3601.8% | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1931.2% | -82.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -954.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.2M | $38.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $350.7M | $7.9M |
| Total Assets | $367.8M | $76.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $350.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $367.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.8M | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-29.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5234.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1872.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-117.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-29.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-46.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -5234.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5314.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3426.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2934.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6307.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4529.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1396.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -431.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1872.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1649.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 940.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 785.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2755.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2070.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 169.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
