vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. (SFBC) and NUSCALE POWER Corp (SMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $8.2M, roughly 1.2× NUSCALE POWER Corp). On growth, NUSCALE POWER Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1635.2% vs 1.5%). Sound Financial Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.0M vs $-199.9M). Over the past eight quarters, NUSCALE POWER Corp's revenue compounded faster (22.4% CAGR vs 5.5%).
U.S. Bancorp is an American multinational banking institution headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota and incorporated in Delaware. It is the 5th-largest bank in the United States as of 2025. As the largest bank in the Midwestern United States, it is considered systemically important by the Financial Stability Board. It is the parent company of its primary operating entity, U.S. Bank National Association, which does business as U.S. Bank. The company provides banking, investment, mortgage, tr...
NuScale Power Corporation is a publicly traded American company that designs and markets small modular reactors (SMRs). It is headquartered in Tigard, Oregon. The company's VOYGR power plant, which uses 50 MWe modules and scales to 12 modules, was the first SMR to be certified by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (2022). The newer 77 MWe module designs, known as the VOYGR-4 and VOYGR-6, were submitted for NRC review on January 1, 2023, and approved May 29, 2025. NuScale is now seekin...
SFBC vs SMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $8.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-273.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | -6532.9% |
| Net Margin | — | -3316.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | 1635.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1465.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.87 | $-1.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.2M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $-273.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $795.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $770.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 91.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -6532.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.5% | -534.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | -264.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | -3316.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -219.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | -104.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -219.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $-1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.79 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $138.5M | $691.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $109.4M | $828.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $883.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $138.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.2M | $691.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.5M | $420.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.5M | $521.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.6M | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.5M | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.0M | $692.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.4M | $704.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.7M | $618.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $101.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $883.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $606.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $618.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $993.6M | $544.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.2M | $-199.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.0M | $-199.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 73.4% | -2425.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-494.0K | $-33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-199.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-518.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 73.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.3% | -2425.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -170.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | -77.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -65.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.84× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SFBC
Segment breakdown not available.
SMR
| Power Plant And NPM Engineering Design And Licensing Services And Fees | $8.0M | 97% |
| Other | $208.0K | 3% |
