vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) and Xometry, Inc. (XMTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xometry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($192.4M vs $159.0M, roughly 1.2× ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.). ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 52.2% vs -4.5%, a 56.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Xometry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.2% CAGR vs 17.7%).
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating full-service banking locations primarily across the Southeastern United States. It offers a full suite of commercial banking, consumer banking, wealth management, and mortgage lending services to small and medium-sized businesses, professional clients, and individual consumers.
Xometry is an online marketplace for sourcing on-demand manufactured parts for prototyping and large-scale production.
SFBS vs XMTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $159.0M | $192.4M |
| Net Profit | $83.0M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 52.2% | -4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 29.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.2% | 12.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $162.2M | $192.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.3M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.1M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.8M | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.7M | $141.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.8M | $132.6M |
| Q1 26 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.4M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.2M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.2M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $-13.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.0% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.5% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.0% | -11.5% |
| Q1 26 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.0% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.1% | -6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.5% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.0% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.9% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.4% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | -10.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $219.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $275.6M |
| Total Assets | $18.2B | $703.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $225.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $240.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $270.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $309.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $314.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $315.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $315.8M |
| Q1 26 | $18.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.7B | $703.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.6B | $698.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $687.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.6B | $690.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $680.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4B | $678.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0B | $678.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-24.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $-427.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $-9.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SFBS
| Net Interest Income | $148.1M | 93% |
| Noninterest Income | $10.8M | 7% |
XMTR
| US | $159.1M | 83% |
| Non Us | $33.3M | 17% |