vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI) and Sleep Number Corp (SNBR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $342.9M, roughly 5.4× Sleep Number Corp). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -11.6%, a 19.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs -19.6%). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.1M vs $-10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs -10.7%).
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
Sleep Number Corporation is an American manufacturer that makes the Sleep Number and Comfortaire beds as well as foundations and bedding accessories. The company is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In addition to its Minnesota headquarters, Sleep Number has manufacturing and distribution facilities in South Carolina and Utah.
SGI vs SNBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $342.9M |
| Net Profit | $140.8M | $-39.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 59.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | -11.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -11.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 54.7% | -19.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 95.8% | -1168.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.71 | $-1.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $342.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $327.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $393.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $376.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $426.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $408.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $470.4M |
| Q4 25 | $140.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.4M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.0M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.1M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.1M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.3M | $-7.5M |
| Q4 25 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.9% | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 59.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.9% | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.1% | 58.7% |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-1.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.47 | $-1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.73 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.60 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.43 | $-0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $-521.3M |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $749.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $-521.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $-480.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $-456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $559.0M | $-451.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $564.5M | $-448.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.8M | $-447.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.6M | $-445.9M |
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4B | $749.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | $804.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $836.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $860.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $864.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $883.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $908.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.92× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.4M | $-6.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.1M | $-10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | -3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 3.1% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $633.2M | $-47.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $99.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.2M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.1M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.4M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $-23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.6M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.2M | $33.7M |
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $360.3M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $369.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.4M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $240.2M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.7M | $24.4M |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
SNBR
| Retail Channel | $301.2M | 88% |
| Online Phone Chat And Other | $41.7M | 12% |
