vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shake Shack Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($400.5M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.6× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 3.0%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shake Shack Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.9% vs 2.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $4.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Shake Shack Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Shake Shack is an American multinational fast casual restaurant chain based in New York City. It started out as a hot dog cart inside Madison Square Park in 2001, and its popularity steadily grew. In 2004, it received a permit to open a permanent kiosk within the park, expanding its menu from New York–style hot dogs to one with hamburgers, hot dogs, fries and its namesake milkshakes.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
SHAK vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $400.5M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $11.8M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.9% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 35.8% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $400.5M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $367.4M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.5M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $320.9M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.7M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $316.9M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.5M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $290.5M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.8M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $360.1M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $247.7M | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $525.3M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $360.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $357.8M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.9M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $320.7M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.9M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $304.4M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $284.8M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $247.7M | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $247.5M | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.2M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.9M | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.7M | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $246.4M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.2M | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $245.9M | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $525.3M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $509.0M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $494.1M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.3M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $470.0M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $456.1M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $462.4M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $446.4M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.49× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.52× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.52× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.1M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.0M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.0% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.8% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.34× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $56.5M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.0M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.7M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.6M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.4% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.34× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.04× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.79× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.36× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.18× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.54× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.03× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SHAK
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
