vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) and Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Warby Parker Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.0M vs $148.3M, roughly 1.4× Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -2.8%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs 11.2%). Warby Parker Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.1M vs $-11.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.8% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Warby Parker Inc. is an American eyewear brand and retailer of prescription glasses, contact lenses, and sunglasses, based in New York City. It also offers eye exams. Originally founded in 2010 as an online-only retailer, the company now generates about two-thirds of its revenue from its 276 physical retail stores, 271 of which are in the U.S. and 5 of which are in Canada. The company intends to operate 900 stores. The company has 2.28 million customers; average order value is $263.
SHLS vs WRBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.3M | $212.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | -3.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.5% | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.6% | 11.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.9% | 13.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.3M | $212.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.8M | $221.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.8M | $214.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.4M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $190.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.2M | $192.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.2M | $188.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.8M | $200.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-282.0K | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-267.0K | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 31.6% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.0% | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 53.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 54.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | 56.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.3M | $286.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $600.0M | $367.7M |
| Total Assets | $904.1M | $720.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $286.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.6M | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $254.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1M | $251.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $238.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.2M | $220.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $168.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $600.0M | $367.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $589.6M | $369.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $575.4M | $361.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $558.9M | $354.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $556.8M | $340.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $545.2M | $336.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $544.6M | $329.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.0M | $316.2M |
| Q4 25 | $904.1M | $720.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $851.8M | $706.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $795.0M | $701.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $788.4M | $682.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $793.1M | $676.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $801.3M | $638.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $788.4M | $618.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.3M | $592.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.30× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.3M | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.6% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 7.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-16.0M | $43.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.8M | $40.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.8M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.0M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.4M | $5.5M |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.4% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 7.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.69× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
WRBY
| Retail | $155.2M | 73% |
| E Commerce | $56.8M | 27% |
