vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Sherwin-Williams is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.5× W. R. Berkley Corporation). W. R. Berkley Corporation runs the higher net margin — 14.0% vs 9.4%, a 4.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sherwin-Williams posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, W. R. Berkley Corporation's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -4.9%).

Sherwin-Williams is an American paints and coatings company based in Cleveland, Ohio. It is primarily engaged in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of paints, coatings, floorcoverings, and related products with operations in over 120 countries. As of 2024, it is the largest coatings company in the world by revenue.

William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.

SHW vs WRB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SHW
SHW
1.5× larger
SHW
$5.7B
$3.7B
WRB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SHW
SHW
+2.8% gap
SHW
6.8%
4.0%
WRB
Higher net margin
WRB
WRB
4.5% more per $
WRB
14.0%
9.4%
SHW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WRB
WRB
Annualised
WRB
5.5%
-4.9%
SHW

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Revenue
$5.7B
$3.7B
Net Profit
$534.7M
$515.2M
Gross Margin
49.1%
Operating Margin
Net Margin
9.4%
14.0%
Revenue YoY
6.8%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
6.1%
EPS (diluted)
$2.15
$1.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$5.7B
$3.7B
Q4 25
$5.6B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$6.4B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$6.3B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$5.3B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$5.3B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$6.2B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$6.3B
$3.3B
Net Profit
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$534.7M
$515.2M
Q4 25
$476.8M
$449.5M
Q3 25
$833.1M
$511.0M
Q2 25
$754.7M
$401.3M
Q1 25
$503.9M
$417.6M
Q4 24
$480.1M
$576.1M
Q3 24
$806.2M
$365.6M
Q2 24
$889.9M
$371.9M
Gross Margin
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
49.1%
Q4 25
48.5%
Q3 25
49.2%
Q2 25
49.4%
Q1 25
48.2%
Q4 24
48.6%
Q3 24
49.1%
Q2 24
48.8%
Operating Margin
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
11.4%
15.4%
Q3 25
16.7%
17.2%
Q2 25
15.6%
14.2%
Q1 25
12.3%
15.2%
Q4 24
11.6%
19.9%
Q3 24
21.4%
14.0%
Q2 24
22.5%
14.7%
Net Margin
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
9.4%
14.0%
Q4 25
8.5%
12.1%
Q3 25
13.1%
13.6%
Q2 25
12.0%
10.9%
Q1 25
9.5%
11.8%
Q4 24
9.1%
15.7%
Q3 24
13.1%
10.8%
Q2 24
14.2%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$2.15
$1.31
Q4 25
$1.91
$1.13
Q3 25
$3.35
$1.28
Q2 25
$3.00
$1.00
Q1 25
$2.00
$1.04
Q4 24
$1.90
$0.89
Q3 24
$3.18
$0.91
Q2 24
$3.50
$0.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$216.9K
$2.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$11.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.4M
Total Assets
$26.4M
$44.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.64×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$216.9K
$2.1B
Q4 25
$207.2M
$2.5B
Q3 25
$241.5M
$2.4B
Q2 25
$269.8M
$2.0B
Q1 25
$199.8M
$1.7B
Q4 24
$210.4M
$2.0B
Q3 24
$238.2M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$200.0M
$1.6B
Total Debt
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$11.7M
Q4 25
$9.7B
Q3 25
$9.7B
Q2 25
$9.0B
Q1 25
$9.0B
Q4 24
$9.2B
Q3 24
$9.2B
Q2 24
$9.0B
Stockholders' Equity
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$4.4M
Q4 25
$4.6B
$9.7B
Q3 25
$4.4B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$4.4B
$9.3B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$8.9B
Q4 24
$4.1B
$8.4B
Q3 24
$4.2B
$8.4B
Q2 24
$3.8B
$7.8B
Total Assets
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$26.4M
$44.3B
Q4 25
$25.9B
$44.1B
Q3 25
$26.2B
$43.7B
Q2 25
$25.4B
$42.7B
Q1 25
$24.6B
$41.3B
Q4 24
$23.6B
$40.6B
Q3 24
$24.0B
$40.4B
Q2 24
$23.7B
$38.9B
Debt / Equity
SHW
SHW
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
2.64×
Q4 25
2.10×
Q3 25
2.18×
Q2 25
2.04×
Q1 25
2.17×
Q4 24
2.28×
Q3 24
2.22×
Q2 24
2.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons