vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of SIGNET JEWELERS LTD (SIG) and WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD (WTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.2× SIGNET JEWELERS LTD). WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD runs the higher net margin — 52.1% vs 1.4%, a 50.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (348.0% vs 3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP LTD's revenue compounded faster (57.4% CAGR vs -25.4%).

Signet Jewelers Ltd. is, as of 2015, the world's largest retailer of diamond jewellery. The company is domiciled in Bermuda and headquartered in Akron, Ohio through the Fairlawn suburb, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The group operates in the middle-market jewellery segment and holds number one positions in the US, Canada, and UK speciality jewellery markets. Certain brands operate in the upper middle market. Signet Jewelers owns and operates the companies Blue Nile, Zales, Kay...

White Mountains Insurance Group is a diversified insurance and related financial services holding company based in Hamilton, Bermuda. Redomiciled from Delaware, United States, on October 25, 1999, the company conducts most of its business through its insurance subsidiaries and other affiliates.

SIG vs WTM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WTM
WTM
1.2× larger
WTM
$1.6B
$1.4B
SIG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WTM
WTM
+344.8% gap
WTM
348.0%
3.1%
SIG
Higher net margin
WTM
WTM
50.7% more per $
WTM
52.1%
1.4%
SIG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WTM
WTM
Annualised
WTM
57.4%
-25.4%
SIG

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Revenue
$1.4B
$1.6B
Net Profit
$20.0M
$835.8M
Gross Margin
37.3%
97.1%
Operating Margin
1.7%
56.2%
Net Margin
1.4%
52.1%
Revenue YoY
3.1%
348.0%
Net Profit YoY
185.7%
741.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.49
$325.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$864.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$689.2M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$577.8M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$358.0M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$839.1M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$395.4M
Q1 24
$2.5B
$647.3M
Net Profit
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$20.0M
$835.8M
Q3 25
$-9.1M
$113.8M
Q2 25
$33.5M
$122.9M
Q1 25
$100.6M
$33.9M
Q4 24
$7.0M
$-130.4M
Q3 24
$-98.5M
$179.0M
Q2 24
$52.1M
$-54.6M
Q1 24
$626.2M
$236.4M
Gross Margin
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
37.3%
97.1%
Q3 25
38.6%
93.6%
Q2 25
38.8%
93.8%
Q1 25
42.6%
98.7%
Q4 24
36.0%
97.9%
Q3 24
38.0%
99.1%
Q2 24
37.9%
98.2%
Q1 24
43.3%
98.8%
Operating Margin
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
1.7%
56.2%
Q3 25
0.2%
20.7%
Q2 25
3.1%
25.6%
Q1 25
6.5%
12.5%
Q4 24
0.7%
-33.7%
Q3 24
-6.8%
28.5%
Q2 24
3.3%
-8.8%
Q1 24
16.7%
35.9%
Net Margin
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
1.4%
52.1%
Q3 25
-0.6%
13.2%
Q2 25
2.2%
17.8%
Q1 25
4.3%
5.9%
Q4 24
0.5%
-36.4%
Q3 24
-6.6%
21.3%
Q2 24
3.4%
-13.8%
Q1 24
25.1%
36.5%
EPS (diluted)
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$0.49
$325.02
Q3 25
$-0.22
$44.18
Q2 25
$0.78
$47.75
Q1 25
$2.25
$13.19
Q4 24
$0.12
$-50.98
Q3 24
$-2.28
$69.68
Q2 24
$-0.90
$-21.24
Q1 24
$11.77
$92.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$234.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$837.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.7B
$5.4B
Total Assets
$5.4B
$12.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$234.7M
Q3 25
$281.4M
Q2 25
$264.1M
Q1 25
$604.0M
Q4 24
$157.7M
Q3 24
$403.1M
Q2 24
$729.3M
Q1 24
$1.4B
Total Debt
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$837.0M
Q3 25
$870.4M
Q2 25
$694.6M
Q1 25
$676.1M
Q4 24
$562.5M
Q3 24
$544.9M
Q2 24
$530.2M
Q1 24
$532.1M
Stockholders' Equity
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$1.7B
$5.4B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$1.9B
$4.6B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$4.4B
Q1 24
$2.2B
$4.5B
Total Assets
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$5.4B
$12.3B
Q3 25
$5.3B
$12.3B
Q2 25
$5.5B
$11.8B
Q1 25
$5.7B
$11.0B
Q4 24
$5.7B
$9.9B
Q3 24
$5.6B
$10.3B
Q2 24
$6.2B
$10.2B
Q1 24
$6.8B
$9.6B
Debt / Equity
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
0.15×
Q3 25
0.18×
Q2 25
0.15×
Q1 25
0.15×
Q4 24
0.13×
Q3 24
0.12×
Q2 24
0.12×
Q1 24
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.0M
$53.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.55×
0.06×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$591.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$31.0M
$53.9M
Q3 25
$86.3M
$359.3M
Q2 25
$-175.3M
$177.5M
Q1 25
$780.7M
$-40.2M
Q4 24
$-75.4M
$64.1M
Q3 24
$43.8M
$269.4M
Q2 24
$-158.2M
$216.8M
Q1 24
$752.2M
$36.5M
Free Cash Flow
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
$-1.5M
Q3 25
$62.3M
Q2 25
$-211.9M
Q1 25
$742.1M
Q4 24
$-138.5M
Q3 24
$15.8M
Q2 24
$-181.5M
Q1 24
$716.1M
FCF Margin
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
-0.1%
Q3 25
4.1%
Q2 25
-13.7%
Q1 25
31.5%
Q4 24
-10.3%
Q3 24
1.1%
Q2 24
-12.0%
Q1 24
28.7%
Capex Intensity
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
2.3%
Q3 25
1.6%
Q2 25
2.4%
Q1 25
1.6%
Q4 24
4.7%
Q3 24
1.9%
Q2 24
1.5%
Q1 24
1.4%
Cash Conversion
SIG
SIG
WTM
WTM
Q4 25
1.55×
0.06×
Q3 25
3.16×
Q2 25
-5.23×
1.44×
Q1 25
7.76×
-1.19×
Q4 24
-10.77×
Q3 24
1.51×
Q2 24
-3.04×
Q1 24
1.20×
0.15×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SIG
SIG

Other$571.9M41%
Zale Jewelry$243.4M17%
Extended Service Plan$129.6M9%
Diamonds Direct$87.9M6%
Blue Nile$74.3M5%
Extended Service Plan And Other Deferred Revenue$69.9M5%
Banter By Piercing Pagoda$69.2M5%
Watches$48.7M3%
Peoples$42.2M3%
James Allen$27.8M2%

WTM
WTM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons