vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.1M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.1× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -1.9%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs 7.6%).
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
SILA vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.0M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 88.9% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.0% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.9% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 88.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 86.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 87.4% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 86.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.3% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.20 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.3M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $32.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $119.1M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 23.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $119.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.9M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.1M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.76× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.84× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
