vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) and StepStone Group Inc. (STEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($940.1M vs $586.5M, roughly 1.6× StepStone Group Inc.). On growth, StepStone Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.0% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, StepStone Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs -11.8%).

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is a leading North American wholesale distributor of landscape supplies. Its offerings cover irrigation components, outdoor lighting, hardscape materials, nursery plants, landscaping tools and related accessories. It mainly serves professional landscapers, contractors, golf course operators, municipal maintenance teams, with a wide branch network across the U.S. and Canada.

Rosetta Stone Inc. is an American education technology software company that develops language, literacy and brain-fitness software. Best known for its language-learning products, in 2013, the company expanded beyond language into education-technology with its acquisitions of Livemocha, Lexia Learning, Fit Brains, and Tell Me More. In 2021, it became a subsidiary of IXL Learning.

SITE vs STEP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SITE
SITE
1.6× larger
SITE
$940.1M
$586.5M
STEP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
STEP
STEP
+72.9% gap
STEP
73.0%
0.1%
SITE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
STEP
STEP
Annualised
STEP
28.2%
-11.8%
SITE

Income Statement — Q1 FY2027 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Revenue
$940.1M
$586.5M
Net Profit
$-123.5M
Gross Margin
33.9%
Operating Margin
-33.2%
Net Margin
-21.0%
Revenue YoY
0.1%
73.0%
Net Profit YoY
35.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
$940.1M
Q4 25
$1.0B
$586.5M
Q3 25
$1.3B
$454.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$364.3M
Q1 25
$939.4M
$377.7M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$339.0M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$271.7M
Q2 24
$186.4M
Net Profit
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-9.0M
$-123.5M
Q3 25
$59.1M
$-366.1M
Q2 25
$129.0M
$-38.4M
Q1 25
$-27.3M
$-18.5M
Q4 24
$-21.7M
$-192.0M
Q3 24
$44.4M
$17.6M
Q2 24
$13.3M
Gross Margin
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
33.9%
Q4 25
34.1%
Q3 25
34.7%
Q2 25
36.4%
Q1 25
33.0%
Q4 24
33.3%
Q3 24
34.0%
Q2 24
Operating Margin
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
-0.5%
-33.2%
Q3 25
6.8%
-148.8%
Q2 25
12.8%
-5.6%
Q1 25
-3.1%
2.6%
Q4 24
-2.5%
-101.7%
Q3 24
5.8%
21.3%
Q2 24
29.4%
Net Margin
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
-0.9%
-21.0%
Q3 25
4.7%
-80.6%
Q2 25
8.8%
-10.5%
Q1 25
-2.9%
-4.9%
Q4 24
-2.1%
-56.6%
Q3 24
3.7%
6.5%
Q2 24
7.2%
EPS (diluted)
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.19
$-1.55
Q3 25
$1.31
$-4.66
Q2 25
$2.86
$-0.49
Q1 25
$-0.61
$-0.37
Q4 24
$-0.46
$-2.61
Q3 24
$0.97
$0.26
Q2 24
$0.20

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$84.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$531.9M
$270.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.6B
$-378.8M
Total Assets
$3.5B
$5.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.33×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
$84.0M
Q4 25
$190.6M
Q3 25
$106.9M
Q2 25
$78.6M
Q1 25
$56.6M
Q4 24
$107.1M
Q3 24
$85.5M
Q2 24
Total Debt
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
$531.9M
Q4 25
$385.4M
$270.2M
Q3 25
$388.4M
$269.9M
Q2 25
$469.9M
$269.6M
Q1 25
$503.0M
$269.3M
Q4 24
$388.2M
$168.9M
Q3 24
$410.6M
$172.3M
Q2 24
$172.1M
Stockholders' Equity
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.7B
$-378.8M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$-233.5M
Q2 25
$1.6B
$153.9M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$179.4M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$209.8M
Q3 24
$1.6B
$397.5M
Q2 24
$366.9M
Total Assets
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
$3.5B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$5.2B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$5.3B
Q2 25
$3.3B
$4.8B
Q1 25
$3.3B
$4.6B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$4.3B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.8B
Debt / Equity
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
0.33×
Q4 25
0.23×
Q3 25
0.23×
Q2 25
0.29×
1.75×
Q1 25
0.32×
1.50×
Q4 24
0.25×
0.81×
Q3 24
0.25×
0.43×
Q2 24
0.47×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$27.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$26.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$18.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$164.8M
$27.2M
Q3 25
$128.6M
$16.2M
Q2 25
$136.7M
$46.3M
Q1 25
$-129.6M
$-66.5M
Q4 24
$119.4M
$27.6M
Q3 24
$115.9M
$53.7M
Q2 24
$50.2M
Free Cash Flow
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$150.3M
$26.7M
Q3 25
$118.5M
$15.9M
Q2 25
$122.4M
$45.2M
Q1 25
$-144.4M
$-69.2M
Q4 24
$109.9M
$27.0M
Q3 24
$105.9M
$52.4M
Q2 24
$49.6M
FCF Margin
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.4%
4.6%
Q3 25
9.4%
3.5%
Q2 25
8.4%
12.4%
Q1 25
-15.4%
-18.3%
Q4 24
10.8%
8.0%
Q3 24
8.8%
19.3%
Q2 24
26.6%
Capex Intensity
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.4%
0.1%
Q3 25
0.8%
0.1%
Q2 25
1.0%
0.3%
Q1 25
1.6%
0.7%
Q4 24
0.9%
0.2%
Q3 24
0.8%
0.5%
Q2 24
0.3%
Cash Conversion
SITE
SITE
STEP
STEP
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
2.18×
Q2 25
1.06×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.61×
3.05×
Q2 24
3.76×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SITE
SITE

Segment breakdown not available.

STEP
STEP

Other$210.1M36%
Management And Advisory Fees Net Focused Commingled Funds$143.3M24%
Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds$85.1M15%
Carried Interest Allocation Separately Managed Accounts$63.6M11%
Carried Interest Allocation Realized$46.7M8%
Management And Advisory Fees Net Advisory And Other Services$18.3M3%
Legacy Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds$10.3M2%
Income Based Incentive Fees$6.0M1%
Management And Advisory Fees Net Fund Reimbursement Revenues$3.1M1%

Related Comparisons