vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and TFS Financial CORP (TFSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SITIME Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.6M vs $83.7M, roughly 1.4× TFS Financial CORP). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 4.2%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
TFS Financial Corporation is a US-based financial holding company primarily operating through its retail banking subsidiary. It offers residential mortgage loans, savings accounts, and other consumer financial products, with its core customer base concentrated in Ohio and Florida, mainly serving individual and family clients.
SITM vs TFSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.6M | $83.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $22.3M |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.2% | 34.0% |
| Net Margin | — | 26.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 88.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -0.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $113.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $85.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $74.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $75.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $75.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $20.0M |
| Q1 26 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | 33.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 26.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $498.5M | $456.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $17.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $498.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $456.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $452.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $463.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $465.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $463.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $560.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $17.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $58.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $57.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 68.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $167.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $88.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-181.0K | $96.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $25.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $85.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $95.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 68.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 83.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | 113.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 127.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | 2.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
