vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SITIME Corp (SITM) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.0M vs $113.3M, roughly 1.8× SITIME Corp). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs 8.1%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs -10.9%). SITIME Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-74.1M). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs -3.2%).
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
SITM vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.3M | $208.0M |
| Net Profit | $9.2M | $33.9M |
| Gross Margin | 56.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 66.3% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 148.7% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $5.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $113.3M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.5M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.3M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.1M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $224.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $222.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.7M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 53.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -35.4% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -46.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -73.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.1% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -86.9% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.84 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.01 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.80 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.83 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.16 | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.26 | $4.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $390.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $934.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.5M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.7M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.2M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $692.5M | $868.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $696.2M | $871.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $872.1M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $878.6M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $942.6M | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $25.4M | $-67.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.0M | $-74.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.5% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.77× | -1.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $35.1M | $100.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-181.0K | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.7M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-36.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.6% | -16.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.77× | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.
VRTS
| Open End Funds | $68.9M | 33% |
| Retail Separate Accounts | $51.3M | 25% |
| Institutional Accounts | $39.6M | 19% |
| Administration And Shareholder Service Fees | $18.4M | 9% |
| Closed End Funds | $15.9M | 8% |
| Distribution And Service Fees | $12.3M | 6% |
